Share Info, Save Names, Get our Newsletter and Access Powerful Tools
Sign Up Now or Click Here to Find Out More

NameVoyager 2.0

Jun 10th 2005

Please join with me in celebrating a milestone with a member of the Baby Name Wizard family. The NameVoyager visualization has just received its first upgrade, with expanded data and a few new tricks up its sleeve.

The two changes NameVoyager users will notice most:

  • The Data. The name usage history now charts back to the 1880s, giving us a much clearer look at the volatile and influential turn-of-the-century naming era. [Suggested searches: try Ida to discover that name's huge 19th-century popularity, or Roosevelt to compare the Theodore and Franklin spikes.]
  • Boys and Girls. You can now choose single-sex searching, spotlighting patterns that differ for boys and girls. [Suggested searches: try girls' names starting with O to see the dominance of a single name, or look at the overall steady usage of M names, then see how it's composed of separate boy and girl waves.]
  • Happy exploring!


    Some additional data notes, for the hardcore NameVoyager fans:

    The popularity figures now go up through 2004, the most recent numbers available. I've used 2004 as the sole representative for the current decade, rather than mixing scales of data. Thanks to reader requests, I'll be planning a separate version of the program with a detailed focus on the past decade.

    The data in this version represents a fuller sample of babies, courtesy of new Social Security Administration figures. For the 1940s on, the sample is a close approximation of the full U.S. newborn population. The earliest years' numbers, though, are based on more skewed samples. For instance, the sex ratio is skewed dramatically toward girls in the 19th-century samples. I adopted a new normalization technique to correct for these differences, and informal data checks suggest that the trends in the early data are still suitably representative of the general population. Also, you may notice that the full "sea of names" view has a slightly different shape, reflecting a tweaked data prep process. The height of the total population for a given decade now accurately shows the proportion of babies receiving a top-1000 name.

    Comments

    1
    June 10, 2005 1:28 PM
    By Nanny

    Great Improvements! I loved seeing even more history!

    2
    June 10, 2005 2:57 PM
    By Laura

    Awesome changes, Laura. Thank you!

    3
    June 10, 2005 5:38 PM
    By Anonymous

    Can you explain how to do the sex-specific searches?

    4
    June 11, 2005 3:47 AM
    By Lara

    Whee! I love this thing! Love your book, too!

    5
    June 12, 2005 1:49 AM
    By Anonymous

    Laura, you rock! The Wizard has become my favorite blog. I have always had a particular fascination for names and am now able to indulge it regularly. It is so refreshing to read well written and thoughtful posts on the Web!--Elizabeth

    6
    June 13, 2005 5:26 PM
    By Anonymous

    Thanks for the update, and the explanation. Your care in the presentation and analysis of the data is why I come to your site and keep coming back (and decided I ought to go ahead and buy the book).

    7
    June 13, 2005 5:27 PM
    By Doug

    So does it only work in Internet Explorer?

    8
    June 13, 2005 6:38 PM
    By Anonymous

    Neither the old nor the new work in Firefox. I've never bothered to figure out why... They both work in Safari.

    9
    June 14, 2005 1:53 AM
    By carla

    They work fine in FireFox for me - maybe you need to (re)install the Java extension. Anyway, Laura, thanks for the upgrade - I'm still in awe of this fascinating tool and your rigorous insights. One interesting thing I noted from the new opening display: over the last 20 years, the top 1000 names account for a smaller fraction of names overall (fewer per 1,000,000) than in the past. This ties in nicely with your observations about the growing numbers of novel names in recent decades.Once again, great job!

    10
    June 14, 2005 5:59 PM
    By Anonymous

    This site is very cool

    11
    June 15, 2005 2:46 AM
    By Nilanjana

    Fascinating! I am Indian and have always been interested about names/naming...I learnt a lot about Western/American names here.

    12
    June 15, 2005 12:48 PM
    By Anonymous

    I just looked up the name Margaret. I noticed some blue in the Voyager results. Were there boys named Margaret? Or, is this a mistake? Thanks.

    13
    June 15, 2005 3:14 PM
    By Anonymous

    Wow! Thank you! I keep coming back to your site week after week to hear your latest news & insights. I love it.

    14
    June 15, 2005 5:52 PM
    By Anonymous

    I've used the old and the new in Firefox. I may have had to previously download the java app for some other site, but you have to do that for IE as well. Anyway, either your settings or the java client are probably the problem. If it's the java client you can get it at http://www.java.com/en/download/windows_automatic.jsp

    15
    June 15, 2005 5:53 PM
    By Anonymous

    The url isn't showing up properly, here are the two halves that you could cut and paste together:http://www.java.com/en/download/windows_automatic.jsp

    16
    June 15, 2005 7:20 PM
    By Anonymous

    About the boys named Margaret, there's an FAQ entry about that:http://babynamewizard.com/namevoyagerfaq.html#oddities

    17
    June 16, 2005 7:20 PM
    By baby metropolis

    I love the improvements. This is such a fun tool. We used the social security website extensively to look for names for our baby. One thing we noticed is that letters like 'N' were in the top 1000 is some decades. These don't show up in name voyager. Did you decide to exclude single letter names? I would be interested in how the popularity of such a bizarre naming custom waxes and wanes.

    18
    February 11, 2011 3:46 AM

    Drawing Juicy Couture sunglasses is easy to do, Juicy Couture bracelet are one of the most enduring models of Nike sneaker. Since 1982, Juicy Couture have been popular in sports, urban fashion and particularly in the hip-hop community.

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

    Archives