Looking to cut back on your baby name budget this year? You're not alone. With trendy letters like Z and Q commanding 10 points a piece, parents across the country are rethinking their naming expenditures. If you're looking to maximize style but minimize points, try these tips for cool, cost-effective baby-names:
Make savvy substitutions
If a 10-point letter like Q isn't in your budget, trying substituting an economical C in names like Cuentin and Cuincy. But beware so-called "lite" combos like like Kw- that pile on almost as many points as the originals!
Cut out waste
Think twice before spending on costly middle names you know you'll never use. One expert trick: to achieve that middle name style for a fraction of the letters, pull a Harry S. Truman and just use the initial.
Dress up your vowels
Inexpensive vowels don't have to be drab. Take your cue from the double-A punch of Aaron to create Aadam and Aanna, or add zest by reversing your i-before-e, even when it's not after c!
You might be surprised how much value is hiding in your own family tree. Hand-me-downs like Jr. and III are still the best bargain in naming. And don't forget those family surnames, which can be packed with high-value letters and prep-school style.
In the five short months since we launched Namipedia, it has become an incredible living world of names. Go to almost any name page and you'll find a fascinating collection of real-life siblings. (Sibs for Sinead? Try Aoife, Eimear, Darragh or Senan. Ernesto? How about Armando, Claudio, Oswaldo and Lidia.) I've also learned a lot from the reader commentary, and I'm often surprised by the ratings the community gives names.
The most amazing contribution, though, is the names themselves. I launched Namipedia with over 6000 names, and users have since added thousands more. From the Albanian name Besnik to the feline-inspired Lynx, the name list grows richer every day.
There are limits, though. We ask users to consider whether a name will really contribute to the quality of the site, based on criteria like cultural significance, popular appeal, and the quality of supporting information offered. We try to be inclusive, especially when the name in question is clearly borne by real people. Sometimes, though, it's a tough call.
Take, for instance, Bree'undra. From the description, the name was custom-constructed to honor two relatives. It exists in the real world, but does it have relevance outside of that family? Or Mako, which would be straightforward enough if it had been submitted as a Japanese name...but it was submitted as a type of shark. Should they stay or should they go?
It strikes me that this kind of decision would be a lot more fun to make with friends. So from time to time, I'm going to put borderline names up for vote on Twitter. Stay or go, you be the judge! Remember, though, you're not voting on whether you LIKE the name, just whether it deserves a place as one of thousands in Namipedia search results. The feed to follow on Twitter:
To vote on a name, just reply with @BabyNameWizard [name] stays or @BabyNameWizard [name] goes.
p.s. Yes, I realize that the internet is divided into two kinds of people: those who use Twitter and those who wish everybody would just shut up about Twitter already. If you fall into the second category, just think of it like this. Twitter is like social networking minus commitment and minus self-revelation. Want to be private and anonymous? No problem. Twitter doesn't care about your age or your education or whether your relationship is "complicated." It just wants you to find interesting comments to read, and maybe write some back if you feel like it. Very low-stress, I promise.
What do these names have in common?
They're all compound names, grafted together from two familiar roots. Some, like Ruthann and Johnpaul, simply conjoin two full names with a little magic name glue. Others are portmanteaus, splicing the names together at a point of overlap: Ale-(X)-avier.
At their best, compound names preserve the virtues of both original names in a form that feels fresh but rooted. At their worst they turn out as Frankennames, misbegotten collections of parts better left buried. What makes a successful compound name tick? For tips, let's turn to a land where compound names run rampant. It's not the land of people, but of commerce.
Back in the '90s, the computer industry convention of mixed-case compound names (WordPerfect, LaserJet) started to infiltrate other industries. Spaces and conjunctions seemed embarassingly old-school. Radio Shack became RadioShack, and the venerable Bank of Boston updated itself to the oh-so-hip BankBoston. Mergers were no longer greeted by ampersands but by compounds like HarperCollins, DaimlerChrysler, and the classic Frankenname PricewaterhouseCoopers.
"Spliced" partial compounds got a boost, too. At one time splicing was the province of the cute, like the candy fruit company Applicious. But once corporate titans renamed themselves Accenture and Verizon, the floodgates were officially open.
That means that the name experts who know the ins and outs of compounding best are brand name experts. (There are far more professional brand namers than professional baby namers, probably because making a living is a factor in career decisions.) One of those brand namers, "The Name Inspector," recently addressed the art of name splicing in his excellent blog. What I call Frankennames, he terms awkwordplay, and he offers some general principles. Take stress patterns:
"Consider the name Teensurance, for an insurance program for parents with teen drivers. Whenever you have a single-syllable word like teen in a blend, you’re going to want to give it some emphasis, especially when it expresses a distinguishing characteristic of something, as teen does in Teensurance. Yet in this name, teen replaces the first syllable of insurance, which isn’t emphasized. "
Next, he points to the transition between the two source words. Coinages like Mapufacture and Syncplicity failed on that score. Try saying Mapufacture out loud a few times; the "pyoo" sound takes over the whole word in a slightly gag-inducing way.
For baby names, I'll suggest a third principle: two names are most likely to combine comfortably into a coherent whole when their individual styles are compatible. Compare, say, Kailynne vs. Helynne.
With those ideas in mind, here are two compound names recently added to Namipedia by users. Do they work? Try to look past whether you like the style, and just focus on the compositions. And remember that these are real people's names, so be gentle:
Elizabella's mom wrote that she formed the name from Elizabeth+Isabella. (That's a nifty mindbender for etymology buffs, since Isabella is a form of Elizabeth to begin with.) To me, this creation seems to pass all our tests. The sounds and syllables get along, and Eliza and Bella could easily be sisters.
In the case of Diamondnique, everything comes down to the central d. If you pronounce the d clearly, it's like a speedbump in a name that's all about sleekness. My immediate instinct is to splice more smoothly into Diamonique, but a quick web search reveals that's a trademark for fake gemstones. Which suggests a final rule of thumb for compound baby naming: if you build your name from ingredients found in the dictionary, prepare for a competitive marketplace.
p.s. The Baby Name Pool contest is underway! Don't forget to enter!