Romance! Adventure! Baby names!

Apr 6th 2007

Back in December, I invited you all to submit nominations for the Baby Name Wizard 2006 Name of the Year. I just chanced on the list of nominations again and something about them struck me funny. It was an image, a feeling...could it be the separate nominations of these three names?

Steele
Addison
Remington

You are growing sleepy...
It is the mid 1980s. The hottest genre on tv is "boy-girl" detective shows where the stars wallow in sexual tension as they capture criminals, defuse bombs, and fire off witty repartee....

If you too were an adolescent girl at that time, I dare you to suppress a nostalgic grin at titles like "Moonlighting," "Remington Steele" and even "Scarecrow and Mrs. King." Any chance that nostalgia is creeping into your baby name ideas? It was the suggestions of both Remington and Steele that really leapt out at me, but Bruce Willis' character on "Moonlighting" was most often called by his surname, Addison. As for Cybill Shepard's character, her impact on names was more immediate. The name Madeline, in all its spellings, had been languishing for decades until Madolyn "Maddie" Hayes hit the screen:

But not everybody back then was a "Moonlighting" fan. If your taste ran to a little less talk and a lot more action, you probably watched Fred Dreyer and Stepfanie Kramer in "Hunter." That graph looks much the same. The name Devon got a big boost from an '80s crime show too, and Colt was raised from obscurity overnight.

Do we have the makings of a micro-genre? It's a stretch, but oh-so tempting. Here's my top-10 list of less common baby names inspired by 1980s detective series. I've thrown in buddy shows and lone eagles as well as the boy-girl pairs. How many do you recognize?

Fletcher
Hart
Hayes
Holt
Houston
Knight
Hawk
Matlock (from two different series!)
McCall
Sheridan

More "names of the year"

Mar 29th 2007

My Baby Name Wizard Name of the Year choices are about baby names as cultural tokens. I look for trends, shifts, and reflections of the zeitgeist. But names are a broad topic. Two other "Name of the Year" winners show off very different concepts of what's new and notable in the wide world of names.

The American Name Society is a scholarly group devoted to onomastic research. Their Name of the Year (NOTY), crowned at the annual ANS conference, isn't limited to names of humans. It can be a place name, a name of a product or an event or a movement -- virtually anything that Society members consider interesting as a name-based phenomenon. Their 2006 selection: Pluto. That was the year when the celestial object Pluto was officially demoted from its longstanding position as a planet in our solar system. (It is now considered a mere "dwarf planet," subject to the derision of Uranus and Neptune.) The ANS president explained the NOTY designation: "Our members believe the great emotional reaction of the public to the demotion of Pluto shows the importance of Pluto as a name. We may no longer believe in the Roman god Pluto, but we still have a sense of personal connection with the former planet."

It's a provocative suggestion, that the public reaction to the "loss" of the planet was based on its name. Would a less attractively named planet not be missed? (See ya, Uranus?) Or perhaps it's simply the fact that the planet had a proper name at all. From that perspective, the choice of Pluto as NOTY could be seen as a statement on the fundamental power of naming. If that giant rock had just been "Planet #9," maybe its demotion wouldn't have left us feeling so unsettled by a world in which nothing is certain.

At the other end of the NOTY spectrum lies the Name of the Year Blog, a decidedly non-scholarly group devoted to the sport of name-ogling. Though that's probably not how they'd prefer to put it. In their own words, they aim "to discover, verify, nominate, elect, and disseminate great names." Their definition of great can be seen in past years' winners such as Crescent Dragonwagon, Tokyo Sexwale, and Nimrod Weiselfish. This NOTY competition is a long-running game, opened to the public for the first time this year. If you want to make your voice heard, fill out their ballot by March 31.

An Ava Olivia on the rocks, please

Mar 22nd 2007

This past Sunday's NY Times style section featured a bar's-eye view of changing name trends. Jonathan Miles wrote:

Like baby names, cocktail names are steered by trends: the smuttily named drinks of the '70s and '80s -- "two Buttery Nipples, please" -- led to the "-tini" phase, which spiraled out of control in the late '90s and hit bottom with the Apple Pie-tini.

The hot trend today? Old fashioned. No, not the Old Fashioned cocktail (whiskey, syrup, bitters, ice, twist). Not even old-fashioned standards like a gin fizz, highball or Tom Collins. Nope, the new thing is old-fashioned-sounding names for new-fangled drinks. The example in the article was a "Poona Club cocktail," a supposed fixture on the menu of a long-gone club in British India. It's a total forgery, and it's not alone. A cocktail expert explained that menu-makers "are trying to sneak their drinks into the canon by coming up with names that sound a hundred years old."

Ring any bells? Some months ago I wrote about the "forged antiques" of the baby name world, the names that evoke images of our great-grandparents' day but don't have the history to back it up. (Here's part 1 and part 2 on that topic.) It seems that stylish parents and stylish bartenders are surfing the same zeitgeist.

If your barstool style is traditional, though, why not just order that gin fizz? Why conjure up forgeries? For the same reason that parents look past real great-grandparent names like Floyd and Myrtle. Even the retro-minded among us live in the 21st century, and our tastes follow accordingly. The faux-retro drink profiled in the Times article features lime-ginger-bay-leaf gin and blood-orange juice. No mere fizz will hit that 21st-century mark. So toast the birth of Ava and Olivia with a Poona Club cocktail, and leave the Tom Collins for Floyd and Myrtle.