For those of you on Twitter, we've started a new feed to deliver bite-sized baby name news, musings and updates. Think of it as quick and tasty name snacks in between the nourishing meals of blog entries!
For those of you not on Twitter, Twitter is a site that lets you write a tiny note or post an interesting link whenever you feel like, and lets other people subscribe to your note feed (and send you notes, if they like). That's about it. It sounds utterly pointless until you try it, and then it suddenly makes sense.
P.S. -- Don't forget to offer your nominations and comments for the upcoming Name of The Year selection! Let's try to keep all the NOTY discussion in the comments of that original post, to make sure all "votes" are counted.
An article in this week's Slate asks, "Why are there so many powerful Michelles in Washington?" Abby Callard writes:
When Michelle Obama moves into the White House next year, she will immediately become the most famous member of one of Washington's most powerful and exclusive clubs: the Michelles.
Callard goes on to list the members of this powerful club, and to speculate on the reasons for the name's power mojo.
I tend to be a little blasé about reports that large numbers of successful people share the same hugely popular name. After all, isn't that exactly what you'd expect? Take, for instance, this 2005 column analyzing the claim that Davids and Susans are unusually likely to get rich. But in the case of the Slate article, something else also gave me pause. The master list of Washington-ruling Michelles included only one person with an actual role in the federal government (a member of congress). The rest were mostly media commentators and wives of powerful men, plus a "well-known life coach." Is that really the best female power name the capital has to offer?
First, let's take a look at the basic claim: do Michelles really rise to political power at a greater rate than other women? Let's assume that the power age band in Washington covers roughly the birth years 1935-1975. About 225,000 American women were named Michelle/Michele/Michell during that time, heavily skewed toward the latter half of the range. The closest matches for that popularity history are Amy and Melissa. If you tally up all the members of congress, cabinet secretaries and deputy secretaries, federal appeals court judges and state governers, you find exactly one Amy, one Melissa, and one Michelle, all in congress. The null hypothesis is looking pretty good about now; Michelles look a lot like everybody else.
So, are there any real power names for Washington women? In congress, the clear winner is Barbara. The name boasts four members, including two senators. (Significantly, the typical Barbara is a full generation older than the typical Michelle, suggesting that the latter name's power days may still lie ahead.) If you broaden to the other categories of government leaders you find another name of interest -- the name which I'd tab as the true #1 political power name for women. Any guesses?
Diana/Diane/Dianne has three representatives in Congress, and four more on the bench in federal appeals courts. That swamps the numbers for similarly common names like Karen and Sharon. Plus you'll find more Dianes, Diannes and Dianas in politics in other nations throughout the English-speaking world. Sure, it's a small sample and not statistically significant. But going back to our discussion of names on ballots...if you see a candidate named Diane or Diana, don't you want to trust her?
As the year draws to a close, we look back over the time that has passed and ask the question that's on everyone's mind. What was THE name of 2008?
The Baby Name Wizard Name of the Year isn't necessarily the most popular baby name -- the past two designees didn't even make the top-1000 charts. It needn't even be the most talked-about name. Last year's runner-up, Chuck, was notable for the way it sidled into the cultural jetstream when nobody was looking. What it needs to be is...well, here's what I wrote last year:
Each year new baby names are created, old names are rediscovered, and familiar names start to sound different to us. Some of those changes are subtle or evolutionary. Others are just blips on the screen that will fade from memory. But perhaps one transformed name stands out above the others...a true Name of the Year?
The Baby Name Wizard Name of the Year could come from anywhere. It might be triggered by music (as Kanye was), movies (Charlize), politics (Monica), commerce (Armani), even the weather (Katrina). Or, like Nevaeh in 2003, it could seemingly come from nowhere to appear everywhere. Whatever its origins it should be a cultural time capsule, capturing some part of the zeitgeist in a single name.
Please post your nominations here, and feel free to second others. Criteria for the final choice will include:
- A dramatic change in the name's usage or social meaning
- A reflection of a broader cultural theme, or influence on broader style trends
- Your votes (frequency of nominations, and compelling arguments)
One additional note applies for this year. The 2008 NOTY is not Barack. Why? Because we already tabbed it for 2007. (Nice work, Baby Name Wizard community!)
Please post your nominations here, and look for the official Name of the Year announcement next month.